Environmental Economic Survey, 2006
West Bank and Gaza, 2004
Get Microdata
Reference ID
PSE-PCBS-EES-2006-V1.0
Producer(s)
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Collections
Created on
Sep 14, 2020
Last modified
Sep 14, 2020
Page views
25731
Downloads
681
Solid waste collection mean inside the Establishment during February 2006 (es18)
Data file: Environmental Economic Survey Mains, 2006
Overview
Valid:
3289
Valid (weighted):
81795.862
Invalid:
0
Invalid (weighted):
0
Minimum:
1
Maximum:
5
Mean:
1.988
Mean (weighted):
2.031
Standard deviation:
1.55
Standard deviation (weighted):
1.594
Questions and instructions
Question pretext
A: Did the produced or treated solids waste reuse during February 2006?
Literal question
Solid waste collection mean inside the Establishment during February 2006
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | Weighted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Municipality open container | 2148 | 53632 |
65.6%
|
| 2 | Municipality closed container | 280 | 5522 |
6.8%
|
| 3 | Establishment open container | 185 | 4654 |
5.7%
|
| 4 | Establishment closed container | 104 | 2469 |
3%
|
| 5 | Without container | 572 | 15518 |
19%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Without container (Go to ES21)
Question post text
Where did the solid waste collect before its final disposal during February 2006?
Description
Universe
All the Palestinian economic establishments, which included in the Economic Series Survey sample in the Palestinian Territory.
Source of information
Economic Establishments
Imputation and derivation
Imputation
The data was collected between 15/03/2006 and 01/06/2006, the reference period during the data collection process was February 2006 for all the data except the periodicity of the solid waste collection, the reference period was the last week of the fieldworker existence in the establishment
Others
Security
Two types of errors affect the quality of survey data; sampling and non sampling errors. The sampling errors are measurable, however the non-sampling errors could not be determined easily due to the diversity of sources (e.g. the interviewers, respondent, editor, data entry operator... etc).
However, several measures were adopted to minimize the effects of these errors. The interviewers, editors and coders had undergone intensive training and were provided with fieldwork manuals to consult when facing any problem.
The data entry program was designed in a way that allows error detection and correction. This applies particularly to logical errors that might not be discovered before data entry operations. A consistency check was also performed to assure accuracy after data entry.
However, several measures were adopted to minimize the effects of these errors. The interviewers, editors and coders had undergone intensive training and were provided with fieldwork manuals to consult when facing any problem.
The data entry program was designed in a way that allows error detection and correction. This applies particularly to logical errors that might not be discovered before data entry operations. A consistency check was also performed to assure accuracy after data entry.